Key findings for team improvement
The Senior Management team currently holds an overall TeamScore of 2.3, placing them at rank #12 out of 21 teams. This positioning indicates that there is considerable room for growth in team dynamics and performance. Psychological Safety is rated at 3 out of 5, suggesting that while team members may feel somewhat secure voicing their opinions, there is still a lack of full openness that could enhance collaboration. However, the stark negative score of -61 in Cognitive Diversity highlights an urgent need for a more varied perspective within the team to foster creativity and problem-solving.

Ratings from team members
Individual accountability
Low ratings in this area undermine trust among team members, making it difficult to rely on each other for responsibilities.

Encourage open feedback to create ownership.

Implement regular check-ins to monitor progress.

Recognize and reward individual contributions to build accountability.

Collaboration
Weak collaboration ratings indicate challenges in team cohesion, which can lead to isolated efforts rather than a unified approach.

Organize team-building activities to strengthen interpersonal relations.

Set collaborative goals to align team efforts toward common objectives.

Use collaborative tools to facilitate communication and cooperation.

Right mix of skills and abilities
If team members feel the skills represented are inadequate, it can lead to frustration and inefficiency in problem-solving.

Identify skill gaps and provide relevant training opportunities.

Encourage cross-training to broaden team expertise.

Consider diverse hiring practices to enhance the skill mix.

Overall team performance
A low rating reflects a perception that the team is not meeting its full potential, hindering motivation and confidence.

Establish performance metrics to measure success and areas for improvement.

Solicit team input on performance improvement strategies.

Celebrate small wins to boost morale and demonstrate progress.

Ratings from other teams
Good job! No areas of concern.

Ratings from clients/suppliers
Good job! No areas of concern.

Areas of least diversity where there may be a risk of groupthink:
Provocativeness: Fun, entertaining
Having many team members who prioritize being entertaining might stifle serious discussions needed for critical decision-making.

Encourage a mix of creative and analytical discussions during meetings.

Invite external experts to challenge the team's perspectives.

Detail orientation: Strategic thinker
A homogenous group of strategic thinkers may overlook practical considerations, which are vital for real-world application.

Foster a culture of constructive criticism to bring in diverse viewpoints.

Engage team members with different thought processes for strategy reviews.

Sensitivity: Forgiving
Too many forgiving individuals may avoid necessary confrontations, leading to unresolved issues that can affect team dynamics.

Create policies that encourage open and honest communication about challenges.

Introduce conflict resolution training to help team members address issues directly.